← AIAP Topic CoursesAll programsHomeSearch
AIAP Topic Courses·Management Consulting·10:44

Part 7: Defining the Problem Statement, and Structuring with MECE

Course instructor (unnamed, ex-McKinsey) Main trainer - IIT Madras engineer, ISB MBA; ITC, Boston Scientific, Paytm, ~4.5 years at McKinsey, now product partnerships at LinkedIn

The short version

  1. Problem definition in three elements (after HBR's 'Are you solving the right problem?'): establish the need (goal, second-order goals, sponsor, who benefits), contextualise (constraints, prior attempts, watch-outs), define the statement (nested problems, hierarchy, KPIs and time span). If the IPO needs profit in six months, a five-year M&A idea is irrelevant (0:00-0:04).
  2. MECE: mutually exclusive (no overlap), collectively exhaustive (nothing missing). Heights quiz: <4, 4-6, >6 ft is MECE; <4, 4-5, 5-6 overlaps and misses the tall. Supply-chain quiz: loading, en route, offloading. Tip: think linearly, chronologically (0:04-0:10).

At a glance, three clicks deep

Skim here first: the closed row is the glance, open is the study card with the key points and timestamps, and the ↓ link drops to that concept's full write-up below.

01Problem definition in three elementsNeed -> context -> statement with KPIs and time.›

Need -> context -> statement with KPIs and time.

Three elements (0:00-0:04)

↓ Full write-up of this concept

02MECE: mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustiveNo overlap, nothing missing;›

No overlap, nothing missing; think in sequence.

MECE and quizzes (0:04-0:10)

↓ Full write-up of this concept

The concepts in full

01

Problem definition in three elements

A CHRO who sponsors an attrition problem has a different first question from a CFO who sponsors a profit problem. Find the sponsor before the statement.

1) Establish the need: the goal and second-order goals, the sponsor, who benefits (shareholders care about pricing because of profit). 2) Contextualise: constraints - the other side of the solution coin - prior attempts, lessons, watch-outs. 3) Define the statement: one problem or nested ones, their hierarchy, requirements for success (KPIs, time span). Example: a company that must show a path to profit in six months for an IPO cannot use a five-year M&A plan. 'A bit of an art and less of a science.'

Why it matters

Most failed projects answered the wrong question well.

02

MECE: mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive

Under four feet, four to five, five to six. Who is five feet exactly, and where did the six-footers go?

Disaggregation breaks the boulder into chunks. Mutually exclusive = no overlap; collectively exhaustive = nothing left out. Heights: (<4, 4-5, 5-6) fails on the overlap at 5 and the missing >6; (<4, 4-6, >6) is MECE. Supply chain late to distributors: loading at the factory, en route, offloading - and a set can be exclusive without being exhaustive. Tip: think linearly, step by step or chronologically.

Why it matters

The test every branch of every tree must pass.

Tools referenced

ToolCoverageMomentContext
McKinseyexplainedSubject of the lesson; nothing else demonstrated

Action items

    Resources mentioned

    Resources
    • docHBR: 'Are you solving the right problem?'

    Extraction notes

    This page was built from an auto-generated transcript, which garbles product and people's names. Those were corrected silently in everything above and logged here for transparency. The warnings flag claims that were true on the recording day but change fast.

    Transcript corrections applied

    The transcript saysThe trainer actually means
    formsfirms
    me see / messyMECE
    PNLP&L

    True on recording day — verify before relying