← Kairos MBA MasterclassAll programsHomeSearch
Kairos MBA Masterclass·21:02

The Analysis Process: Four Analysis Types, Data Collection, a Worked Chart Diagnosis, Ad Cannibalisation, and the Attribution Problem

Anand Menon Analytics trainer - heads strategy, special projects and international business at Wakefit; ex Flipkart (kids fashion P&L) and Sephora India; IIM Kozhikode

The short version

  1. Descriptive (what happened), diagnostic (why), predictive (what might), prescriptive (what to do) - the value is in prescriptive, and few tools do it, so the analyst who diagnoses, projects and recommends is the one who matters. Collection: transactions, surveys (no leading questions), behaviour tracking (heat maps, legally), interviews (0:00-0:07).
  2. Chart walk: revenue 1.4x September to October with traffic 1.26x looks good until last year's 1.7x on the same traffic shows weaker conversion capture. Marketplace ads: ad revenue up, organic cannibalised, overall ROAS fell from 45 to 15 (0:07-0:14).
  3. Attribution: redesign vs Diwali, subject lines vs send time, calendars vs gyms - list every factor, run controlled A/B tests, accept that 100% attribution is impossible. Hand-off to the 11-question Excel case (0:14-0:22).

At a glance, three clicks deep

Skim here first: the closed row is the glance, open is the study card with the key points and timestamps, and the ↓ link drops to that concept's full write-up below.

01Descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, prescriptiveFour types;›

Four types; aim at prescriptive.

Types (0:00-0:04)

Collection (0:04-0:07)

↓ Full write-up of this concept

02Reading a chart against the right baseline, and ad cannibalisationCompare to the right prior period;›

Compare to the right prior period; watch organic when ads rise.

Chart walk (0:07-0:12)

Cannibalisation (0:12-0:14)

↓ Full write-up of this concept

03The attribution problemList factors;›

List factors; test; never claim 100%.

Attribution (0:14-0:20)

Case hand-off (0:20-0:22)

↓ Full write-up of this concept

The concepts in full

01

Descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, prescriptive

Dashboards tell you what happened. The job is to say what to do next.

Descriptive = what happened (dashboards, trends, seasonality). Diagnostic = why (patterns, causal relationships, root-cause analysis). Predictive = what might happen (project trend lines; plan pricing and inventory). Prescriptive = what you should do (scenarios that recommend discount and stock levels). Reliable prescriptive tools are rare, so analysts who diagnose, project and then recommend add the most value. Collection methods: transactional tracking; surveys (avoid leading questions and socially acceptable answers); online behaviour tracking (heat maps, page sequences, mind compliance); interviews and focus groups for cultural insight.

Why it matters

Positions the analyst's job at the recommendation, not the chart.

02

Reading a chart against the right baseline, and ad cannibalisation

Ad revenue up, ad spend up, total revenue up - and ROAS fell from 45 to 15. The ads bought shoppers who were already coming.

Revenue up 1.4x September to October (descriptive); traffic up 1.26x with better conversion (diagnostic); but last year the same traffic jump gave 1.7x, so this year's conversion capture was weaker - discounts, delivery timelines or campaigns to investigate. Marketplace case: mandate is ROAS (return on ad spend) around 8; ads lifted ad revenue and total revenue, yet overall ROAS fell from 45 to 15.1 because organic revenue shrank - the ads cannibalised sales that would have happened anyway. Always see the complete picture and pick the right baseline (last year, the previous sale event).

Why it matters

Two diagnoses that look like good news until the baseline appears.

03

The attribution problem

The redesign went live in September. So did the sale. So did Diwali. Who gets the credit?

Credit is hard to assign when several factors move together: website redesign vs the October sale and Diwali; email open rate credited to subject lines when send time, weekday and cohort engagement matter; calendars and gym memberships both spike in January. Mitigations: carefully controlled A/B tests, list all factors, accept that full attribution is impossible. Hand-off: the 'mega' Excel case - play category head, 11 questions, answer in Excel.

Why it matters

Keeps analysts honest about what a number can prove.

Tools referenced

ToolCoverageMomentContext
AmazonexplainedMarketplace ads case
Flipkartexplained
Microsoft Excelmentioned

Action items

    Resources mentioned

    Resources
    • docAbsolute Beauty case dataset (Excel)

    Extraction notes

    This page was built from an auto-generated transcript, which garbles product and people's names. Those were corrected silently in everything above and logged here for transparency. The warnings flag claims that were true on the recording day but change fast.

    Transcript corrections applied

    The transcript saysThe trainer actually means
    test case / SQ / SQLSKU
    GMBGMV
    average selling pointaverage selling price (ASP)
    1 0 1 / 2 0 1101 / 201

    True on recording day — verify before relying