← All sessionsHomeSearch
Part 107 Made Easy·Loading and Performance·1:20:12

Section 2: Loading and Performance — Four Forces, Load Factor, and Where the CG Belongs

Greg Lead instructor. Sets the course's teaching stance in this first content chapter: 'I don't teach for the test... I teach because these things are important for you to know' - then closes with the FAA-question run-through anyway.

The short version

  1. The warm-up chapter, deliberately 'a little bit lighter': aerodynamics every remote pilot is tested on even if they only ever fly quads - 'there will be questions on the test almost 100% guaranteed about airplanes.' References: P-HAK 4.5/4.6/5, course study guide ch. 4.
  2. The three axes and their controls transfer wholesale: roll = ailerons, pitch = elevator, yaw = rudder - mapped onto the quad transmitter (right stick roll/pitch, left stick yaw/throttle).
  3. Four forces: lift (at the center of pressure, made by Newton's deflection AND Bernoulli's pressure differential), weight (at the CG), thrust, drag - with level unaccelerated flight meaning lift=weight AND thrust=drag. Drag splits into parasite (form + interference ['one plus one equals three'] + skin friction, growing with speed) and induced (exists only with lift, SHRINKS with speed).
  4. The stall corrected: it's the CRITICAL ANGLE OF ATTACK, not the engine and not low speed - 'a wing can stall at any airspeed.' Quads essentially can't stall; their motors make the lift. And the exam's favorite twist: critical AoA never changes with weight or CG.
  5. Load factor with the numbers the exam wants: 60° bank = 2G, 80° ≈ 5.7G, 85° ≈ 11.5G, 30° = 1.154; a 45° bank raises stall speed 20% - and his worked example shows a 60° bank stalling an aircraft that had a comfortable margin seconds earlier.
  6. CG doctrine both directions: aft CG = faster cruise, more range, less stability, lower stall speed; forward CG = the opposites plus easier stall recovery. Beyond limits either way = uncontrollable. Quad version: CG centered among the motors, or the heavy side's motors overwork, overheat, and tip you over on takeoff.

The concepts

01

Three axes, three controls — and why quad pilots get airplane questions

Your certificate says small UAS, not quadcopter - so the FAA tests ailerons and rudders you may never touch.

Roll, pitch, yaw - identical vocabulary for fixed-wing and rotorcraft. Fixed wing: ailerons at the wingtips move opposite to roll; the elevator pitches; the rudder yaws. On the quad transmitter the same words map to sticks: right stick left/right IS aileron/roll, right stick forward/back IS elevator/pitch, left stick left/right IS rudder/yaw, left stick up/down is throttle. He's blunt about why this matters: 'there will be questions on the test almost 100% guaranteed about airplanes.'

Why it matters

The exam's aerodynamics questions assume this mapping - and every later concept (stalls, load factor, CG) is expressed in these terms.

Go deeper

In one line: Roll=ailerons, pitch=elevator, yaw=rudder on all aircraft; quad sticks map the same controls (right stick roll/pitch, left stick yaw/throttle); the certificate is general-sUAS, so fixed-wing control theory is fair game.

Roll/aileron, pitch/elevator, yaw/rudder - one vocabulary for all aircraft (l4443 0:00-0:01)

Quad transmitter mapping: right stick = roll+pitch, left stick = yaw+throttle (l4443 0:01-0:03)

'Almost 100% guaranteed' airplane questions even for quad-only pilots (l4443 0:00)

▶ Watch this taught:

02

Four forces and two explanations of lift

Lift has two fathers - Newton pushing air down, Bernoulli thinning it on top - and the exam respects both.

Lift, weight, thrust, drag - on a quad, the motors play the wing's role. Lift acts at the center of pressure (CP, also called center of lift); in straight-and-level flight lift equals weight, and the imbalance either way is a climb or descent. The two mechanisms: Newton's third law (a tilted surface deflects air down, the reaction pushes up) and Bernoulli (air over the longer top path speeds up, pressure drops, and 'high pressure moves toward low pressure' - up through the wing).

Angle of attack is the angle between the RELATIVE WIND and the CHORD LINE (leading edge to trailing edge) - and lift rises with both airspeed and AoA: 'the faster we go, the more lift we create.' One orientation rule worth engraving: 'lift is always going to be perpendicular to the relative wind' - which is exactly why banking converts some of it into turning force.

Why it matters

Load factor, stalls, and CG effects are all downstream of this force picture; misplace CP vs CG and none of the moment logic works.

Go deeper

In one line: Lift acts at CP, weight at CG; level flight = lift=weight, thrust=drag; lift is a function of airspeed and AoA (relative wind vs chord line), produced by deflection (Newton) + pressure differential (Bernoulli), always perpendicular to relative wind.

Four forces apply to fixed-wing and rotorcraft alike (l4444 0:00-0:02)

CP/CL is the lift point; distinct from CG (l4445 0:00-0:01)

AoA = relative wind vs chord line (l4446 0:01-0:02)

More speed or more AoA = more lift (l4446 0:04)

'Lift is always perpendicular to the relative wind' (l4446 0:03)

Newton + Bernoulli both taught as lift mechanisms (l4446 0:05, l4447 0:00-0:03)

▶ Watch this taught:

03

Drag: parasite grows with speed, induced shrinks with it

Two drags with opposite personalities - one loves speed, one hates it - and the exam asks which is which.

PARASITE drag rises with airspeed and has three faces: form drag (shape), interference drag (junction turbulence - his mnemonic 'one plus one equals three': a wing joined to a fuselage drags more than both measured separately), and skin friction (rivets, chipped paint, bug splatter). INDUCED drag is lift's tax: it exists only while lift is being made, grows with angle of attack, and - the counterintuitive half - DECREASES as airspeed increases.

Why it matters

The exam trades on the asymmetry; so does real efficiency - slow, high-AoA flight is induced-drag country, fast flight is parasite-drag country.

Go deeper

In one line: Parasite drag (form + interference + skin friction) rises with speed; induced drag exists only with lift, rises with AoA, falls with speed.

Parasite subtypes: form, interference, skin friction (l4450 0:00-0:03)

'One plus one equals three' - interference drag at junctions (l4450 0:01-0:02)

Induced drag: only when lifting, up with AoA, DOWN with speed (l4451 0:00-0:02)

▶ Watch this taught:

Check yourself

Answer from memory first — the recall attempt is what makes it stick. Then reveal.

Which drag dominates at low speed and high angle of attack?

Induced drag - it's created by lift generation and grows with AoA, while parasite drag is still small at low speed.

04

The stall is an angle, not an engine — and not a speed

A wing can stall in a fast dive. The word has nothing to do with the motor quitting.

A stall happens when the wing exceeds its CRITICAL ANGLE OF ATTACK and airflow separates from the upper surface, collapsing lift. Low airspeed is the usual road there, but 'a wing can stall at any airspeed' - a fast, steep dive with an abrupt pull-up does it too. Fixed-wing recovery: lower the nose, reduce AoA below critical. Quadcopters essentially cannot stall - the motors make the lift and keep spinning at any attitude.

The exam's favorite subtlety: the critical angle itself 'remains the same regardless of gross weight' - weight and CG change the SPEED at which you reach that angle, never the angle.

Why it matters

The load-factor concept next door is really a stall concept: banking raises the speed at which the unchanging critical angle arrives.

People get this wrong

Stalls happen when you fly too slowly.

Stalls happen at an ANGLE. Slow flight just forces high AoA to hold altitude - the dive-and-yank stall proves speed alone never protects you.

Go deeper

In one line: Stall = exceeding critical AoA -> flow separation -> lift collapse; possible at any airspeed; recovery = reduce AoA; quads are effectively stall-proof; critical AoA is invariant with weight/CG.

Stall = critical AoA exceeded, unrelated to the engine (l4452 0:00)

Any airspeed can stall - dive + abrupt pull example (l4452 0:01)

Recovery: lower the nose (l4452 0:03)

Quads essentially can't stall - motor lift (l4452 0:03)

EXAM: critical AoA constant regardless of gross weight (l4461 0:02-0:03)

▶ Watch this taught:

05

Load factor: the bank-angle numbers and the stall margin they eat

He was cruising with 5 mph of stall margin. One 60-degree bank later, the stall speed was above his airspeed.

Load factor is the G-load the structure feels - the 'resultant load' - and it climbs with bank angle: 60° = 2G (a 10 lb aircraft momentarily weighs 20 lbs to itself), 80° ≈ 5.7G, 85° ≈ 11.5G. The FAA's own sample figure: a 30° bank = 1.154. Because stall speed rises with the square root of load factor, a 45° bank adds 20% to stall speed (20 mph becomes 24).

His worked disaster: stall speed 15 mph, cruising at 20 - a five-mph cushion. Roll into a 60° bank and load factor 2 pushes stall speed to ~25 mph, five mph ABOVE current airspeed. The aircraft stalls mid-turn with no warning change in speed. He ties it to real fatal accidents in manned aviation: slow, low, steep turn to final.

Why it matters

This is the chapter's most exam-tested computation AND its most safety-relevant lesson - steep turns at low speed are how margin evaporates invisibly.

Bank angle vs G-load - the margin thief 30° 1.15 G 45° 1.41 G (+20% stall speed) 60° 2 G (stall speed +41%) 80° 5.7 G 85° 11.5 G The worked trap: stall 15 mph cruise 20 mph 60° bank -> stall ~25 mph = mid-turn stall Load factor rises with bank; stall speed rises with the square root of load factor
Bank angle vs G-load - and what a 60-degree bank does to stall speed
Go deeper

In one line: Load factor (G) rises with bank: 30°=1.154, 60°=2, 80°≈5.7, 85°≈11.5; stall speed scales with sqrt(load factor) (~+20% at 45°, ~+41% at 60°); exam answer: load factor increases in 'maneuvers other than straight and level flight.'

60° bank = 2G - 10 lb airframe carries 20 lbs (l4453 0:04)

80° ≈ 5.7G; 85° ≈ 11.5G (l4453 0:04-0:05)

30° bank = 1.154 load factor - FAA sample figure (l4461 0:03)

45° bank: stall speed +20% (l4454 0:02)

Worked example: 5 mph margin erased by one 60° bank (l4454 0:00-0:02)

EXAM: load factor increases in maneuvers other than straight-and-level - not from lighter weight or aft CG (l4461 0:01-0:02)

Try it now

Compute your own margin: take any aircraft's straight-flight stall speed, multiply by 1.2 for 45 degrees and ~1.41 for 60 - then compare against your typical maneuvering speed.

▶ Watch this taught:

06

Static vs dynamic stability, by way of a rolling cup

Knock a cup: does it rock back upright, roll away indifferent, or fall further? That's static stability in one table demo.

STATIC stability is the INITIAL tendency after a disturbance: positive (noses back toward equilibrium - the cup rocking upright), neutral (continues without worsening - the cup rolling on its side), negative (diverges - the cup going over). DYNAMIC stability is what happens over TIME given positive static stability: positive dynamic damps the oscillation out; neutral dynamic oscillates forever at constant amplitude; negative dynamic makes each swing bigger.

Why it matters

The exam asks these as definitions; designers ask them as trade-offs - the CG concept next door is literally a stability dial.

Go deeper

In one line: Static stability = initial tendency (positive/neutral/negative); dynamic stability = oscillation behavior over time (damping/constant/diverging), layered on positive static.

Stability = tendency to return to original flight path (l4455 0:00)

Static: positive/neutral/negative initial tendency (l4455 0:01-0:02)

Dynamic: over-time response - damps, holds, or diverges (l4455 0:03-0:04)

▶ Watch this taught:

07

CG, arm, moment — and what moving the balance point buys and costs

A door explains the whole chapter: push at the knob and it swings easily; push near the hinge and you strain. Arm times force is moment - and your aircraft is a door balanced on its CG.

Vocabulary first: CG is where weight acts and the craft balances; CP is where lift acts (nearby but distinct); ARM is the distance from CG to an applied force; MOMENT is arm x force. On a fixed wing, lift ahead at the CP makes a nose-down moment; the tail pushes DOWN to counter it. Move the CG AFT and the arm shrinks: less tail-down force needed, so better cruise, more range, shorter takeoff - paid for with less stability, easier over-control, and a lower stall speed. Move it FORWARD and everything mirrors: slower, less range, longer takeoff, but more stable and easier stall recovery.

The limits are the ENVELOPE, and beyond them is not degraded performance but uncontrollability: too far forward and the nose never lifts; too far aft and it stalls the moment it's airborne. Quad translation: CG centered among the four motors - offset loading overworks and overheats the heavy side's motors and tips the aircraft on takeoff. Two accident receipts: an unsecured 360 camera shifting mid-flight downed a DJI Matrice; a failed cargo strap shifted a C-130's CG aft with fatal results.

Worked example · from the session

The RPIC duty framing that opens the chapter: YOU verify loading against the manufacturer's weight-and-balance spec before flight - small drones ship a flight manual, larger ones a POH or UAS flight manual. And the exam trap: loading instructions live in the POH/UAS flight manual - NOT the AIM, and not an 'aircraft weight and balance handbook,' which does not exist (l4442, l4461 0:00).

Why it matters

This is the section's namesake skill - loading IS performance, and the envelope logic transfers to every payload decision on a working drone.

CG position: every gain buys an equal loss AFT CG + cruise speed + range, shorter takeoff - stability - lower stall speed too far: stalls at liftoff FORWARD CG - cruise speed - range, longer takeoff + stability + easier stall recovery too far: nose never lifts Quad translation: CG centered among the motors - offset loads overheat the heavy side and tip on takeoff
Forward vs aft CG - every gain purchases an equal and opposite loss
Go deeper

In one line: Moment = arm x force. Aft CG trades stability for speed/range; forward CG trades speed for stability and stall recovery; outside the envelope = uncontrollable either way. Quad CG belongs centered among motors; RPIC personally owns pre-flight loading verification against the manufacturer's spec.

Moment = arm x force; the door analogy (l4456 0:02-0:04)

Lift at CP forward of CG -> nose-down moment countered by tail-down force (l4458 0:00-0:01)

Aft CG: +cruise +range +short takeoff / -stability, lower stall speed (l4458 0:03-0:04)

Forward CG: mirror image, plus easier stall recovery (l4458 0:04-0:05)

Beyond envelope: nose-heavy can't rotate; tail-heavy stalls at liftoff (l4459 0:00)

Quad: off-center CG overheats heavy-side motors, tips on takeoff (l4459 0:00-0:02)

EXAM: loading instructions are in the POH / UAS flight manual (l4461 0:00)

▶ Watch this taught:

Check yourself

Answer from memory first — the recall attempt is what makes it stick. Then reveal.

Mounting a heavier camera slightly behind a quad's center - what are the two failure modes he warns about?

The rear motors run harder and hotter (long-term burnout risk), and the imbalance can tip the aircraft over during takeoff. Center the mass among the motors or rebalance.

08

Hot, high, humid, heavy: the four performance thieves

His own drone at 12,000 feet flew like it was wading through syrup - same aircraft, thinner air.

Altitude thins the air, so each prop rotation grips less of it - less lift, mushy controls. Heat and humidity both thin it further; a hot humid summer afternoon is the worst combination. Cold has a different failure mode: it saves the air density but drains BATTERY performance. Weight compounds everything - a heavier craft needs more speed or more AoA, both of which add drag, stretching takeoff and landing distances and flattening climb. Pre-flight environmental checks close the chapter: level launch surface, wind (fixed-wing launches INTO it for free relative wind), and obstacle clearance with margin.

Why it matters

Every working-day go/no-go call - payload vs heat vs altitude - is this concept applied.

Go deeper

In one line: Performance falls with altitude, temperature, humidity, and weight; cold uniquely attacks battery life; heavier craft need speed/AoA that cost drag; launch checks = surface, slope, wind direction, obstacles.

Higher altitude -> less dense air -> less lift per rotation, mushy response (l4460 0:00)

Heat + humidity both cut performance; combined worst case (l4460 0:01)

Cold cuts battery life specifically (l4460 0:01)

Weight -> more speed/AoA -> more drag -> longer takeoff/landing, weaker climb (l4460 0:02)

Real numbers: Mavic 2 rated ~32 min flies ~25-27 normal, ~20 in Sport mode (l4456 0:00-0:01)

▶ Watch this taught:

Every concept, three clicks deep

The same concepts as a quick reference: the closed row is the glance, open is the study card, and every timestamp jumps into the recording.

01Three axes, three controls — and why quad pilots get airplane questionsRoll=ailerons, pitch=elevator, yaw=rudder on all aircraft;

Roll=ailerons, pitch=elevator, yaw=rudder on all aircraft; quad sticks map the same controls (right stick roll/pitch, left stick yaw/throttle); the certificate is general-sUAS, so fixed-wing control theory is fair game.

Roll/aileron, pitch/elevator, yaw/rudder - one vocabulary for all aircraft (l4443 0:00-0:01)

Quad transmitter mapping: right stick = roll+pitch, left stick = yaw+throttle (l4443 0:01-0:03)

'Almost 100% guaranteed' airplane questions even for quad-only pilots (l4443 0:00)

02Four forces and two explanations of liftLift acts at CP, weight at CG;

Lift acts at CP, weight at CG; level flight = lift=weight, thrust=drag; lift is a function of airspeed and AoA (relative wind vs chord line), produced by deflection (Newton) + pressure differential (Bernoulli), always perpendicular to relative wind.

Four forces apply to fixed-wing and rotorcraft alike (l4444 0:00-0:02)

CP/CL is the lift point; distinct from CG (l4445 0:00-0:01)

AoA = relative wind vs chord line (l4446 0:01-0:02)

More speed or more AoA = more lift (l4446 0:04)

'Lift is always perpendicular to the relative wind' (l4446 0:03)

Newton + Bernoulli both taught as lift mechanisms (l4446 0:05, l4447 0:00-0:03)

03Drag: parasite grows with speed, induced shrinks with itParasite drag (form + interference + skin friction) rises with speed;

Parasite drag (form + interference + skin friction) rises with speed; induced drag exists only with lift, rises with AoA, falls with speed.

Parasite subtypes: form, interference, skin friction (l4450 0:00-0:03)

'One plus one equals three' - interference drag at junctions (l4450 0:01-0:02)

Induced drag: only when lifting, up with AoA, DOWN with speed (l4451 0:00-0:02)

04The stall is an angle, not an engine — and not a speedStall = exceeding critical AoA -> flow separation -> lift collapse;

Stall = exceeding critical AoA -> flow separation -> lift collapse; possible at any airspeed; recovery = reduce AoA; quads are effectively stall-proof; critical AoA is invariant with weight/CG.

Stall = critical AoA exceeded, unrelated to the engine (l4452 0:00)

Any airspeed can stall - dive + abrupt pull example (l4452 0:01)

Recovery: lower the nose (l4452 0:03)

Quads essentially can't stall - motor lift (l4452 0:03)

EXAM: critical AoA constant regardless of gross weight (l4461 0:02-0:03)

05Load factor: the bank-angle numbers and the stall margin they eatLoad factor (G) rises with bank: 30°=1.154, 60°=2, 80°≈5.7, 85°≈11.5;

Load factor (G) rises with bank: 30°=1.154, 60°=2, 80°≈5.7, 85°≈11.5; stall speed scales with sqrt(load factor) (~+20% at 45°, ~+41% at 60°); exam answer: load factor increases in 'maneuvers other than straight and level flight.'

60° bank = 2G - 10 lb airframe carries 20 lbs (l4453 0:04)

80° ≈ 5.7G; 85° ≈ 11.5G (l4453 0:04-0:05)

30° bank = 1.154 load factor - FAA sample figure (l4461 0:03)

45° bank: stall speed +20% (l4454 0:02)

Worked example: 5 mph margin erased by one 60° bank (l4454 0:00-0:02)

EXAM: load factor increases in maneuvers other than straight-and-level - not from lighter weight or aft CG (l4461 0:01-0:02)

06Static vs dynamic stability, by way of a rolling cupStatic stability = initial tendency (positive/neutral/negative);

Static stability = initial tendency (positive/neutral/negative); dynamic stability = oscillation behavior over time (damping/constant/diverging), layered on positive static.

Stability = tendency to return to original flight path (l4455 0:00)

Static: positive/neutral/negative initial tendency (l4455 0:01-0:02)

Dynamic: over-time response - damps, holds, or diverges (l4455 0:03-0:04)

07CG, arm, moment — and what moving the balance point buys and costsMoment = arm x force.

Moment = arm x force. Aft CG trades stability for speed/range; forward CG trades speed for stability and stall recovery; outside the envelope = uncontrollable either way. Quad CG belongs centered among motors; RPIC personally owns pre-flight loading verification against the manufacturer's spec.

Moment = arm x force; the door analogy (l4456 0:02-0:04)

Lift at CP forward of CG -> nose-down moment countered by tail-down force (l4458 0:00-0:01)

Aft CG: +cruise +range +short takeoff / -stability, lower stall speed (l4458 0:03-0:04)

Forward CG: mirror image, plus easier stall recovery (l4458 0:04-0:05)

Beyond envelope: nose-heavy can't rotate; tail-heavy stalls at liftoff (l4459 0:00)

Quad: off-center CG overheats heavy-side motors, tips on takeoff (l4459 0:00-0:02)

EXAM: loading instructions are in the POH / UAS flight manual (l4461 0:00)

08Hot, high, humid, heavy: the four performance thievesPerformance falls with altitude, temperature, humidity, and weight;

Performance falls with altitude, temperature, humidity, and weight; cold uniquely attacks battery life; heavier craft need speed/AoA that cost drag; launch checks = surface, slope, wind direction, obstacles.

Higher altitude -> less dense air -> less lift per rotation, mushy response (l4460 0:00)

Heat + humidity both cut performance; combined worst case (l4460 0:01)

Cold cuts battery life specifically (l4460 0:01)

Weight -> more speed/AoA -> more drag -> longer takeoff/landing, weaker climb (l4460 0:02)

Real numbers: Mavic 2 rated ~32 min flies ~25-27 normal, ~20 in Sport mode (l4456 0:00-0:01)

Tools referenced

ToolCoverageMomentContext
Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge (PHAK)explainedSections 4.5, 4.6 and 5 assigned for this chapter
FAA Airman Knowledge Testing SupplementexplainedBuy the printed book and practice flipping to figures by number - the exam hands you paper, not clickable images; Appendix 1 legends are 'like having your own cheat sheet'
Airman Certification Standards (ACS)mentionedChapter mapped to ACS area 5, 4.5
DJImentionedMavic 2 battery reality-check; Matrice camera-shift crash example

Session materials

Archived locally on V: — click to open. Companion pages link to the LMS.

Action items

    Extraction notes

    This page was built from an auto-generated transcript, which garbles product and people's names. Those were corrected silently in everything above and logged here for transparency. The warnings flag claims that were true on the recording day but change fast.

    Transcript corrections applied

    The transcript saysThe trainer actually means
    APS, the Airman Certification StandardACS
    the p-hackP-HAK (Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge)
    digger right herediagram right here
    12 times 11.5 times the force of gravity11.5 times the force of gravity (false start)
    figure 59 is on page 256 2 for appendix 2 and then 56figure 59, Appendix 2, page 56

    True on recording day — verify before relying